Regulating On The Blockchain
Introduction
In the current regulatory environment, complex regulations and their resulting fines can have a big impact on the way companies do business. As blockchain technology continues to mature, these regulations need to adapt in order for businesses to remain competitive in an increasingly digital world. Blockchain provides many benefits for regulators and governments because it offers a transparent ledger of transactions that cannot be changed after they are recorded.
Blockchain technology is poised to transform everything from our identity to the way we vote. This has prompted many to ask what the ramifications will be for regulations that have been put in place over the last few decades.
Blockchain technology is poised to transform everything from our identity to the way we vote. This has prompted many to ask what the ramifications will be for regulations that have been put in place over the last few decades.
In a recent report published by PwC, they estimate that blockchain could save businesses $100 billion annually by 2022. These savings come from reducing costs associated with intermediary services such as clearing houses and auditors which are used by banks today – services that don’t require human interaction because they run on software rather than being controlled by people or companies (like SWIFT).
Regulations can be applied to blockchains and their users in a number of ways.
Blockchains are not exempt from regulation, and governments around the world are beginning to realize this. While some countries have already begun issuing regulations for cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, others are still working out how best to apply existing rules.
The first step towards regulating blockchains is defining what exactly they are as a technology–a process that isn’t always easy since many different types of blockchains exist. Some experts argue that we should treat all blockchains similarly because they all share similar characteristics: being decentralized, transparent and immutable are just three examples of these shared traits. However, others believe each type should be treated differently due to their unique features (for example: Ethereum vs Bitcoin).
Even once we’ve established which types belong together or apart based on their similarities/dissimilarities within groups of similar technologies like cryptocurrencies vs smart contracts vs side chains etc., there still remains an issue with determining what exactly constitutes “regulation” itself when applied across such a broad spectrum of technologies with varying degrees of adoption among users who may not necessarily understand its implications either way before making decisions about using certain systems over another one.”
Conclusion
In the future, we can expect to see more regulations being applied to blockchains and their users. This will likely come in the form of new laws that are designed specifically for this new technology. It will be interesting to see how these regulations will impact the way people use cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ether as well as other types of digital assets like tokens or digital securities.